Three-week Cost Optimization Initiative
Vendor-by-vendor analysis: what you pay, what you actually use, and where overlap or low utilization is hiding. Output is a Technology P&L with a prioritized savings opportunity map and timing-based negotiation leverage. Mid-market engagements at this scale typically identify 15 to 25 percent recoverable IT spend in year one (conservative end of published industry ranges of 20 to 30 percent for vendor consolidation savings; Forrester, CloudEagle, BetterCloud 2024-2025). We identify; you execute. Duration depends on vendor count and data quality at kickoff.
Who this is for
A defensible map of where your technology spend is and is not earning its keep.
CFO
You want a Technology P&L by function with utilization data, not a vendor list. Usable in board materials and renewal decisions.
PE Operating Partner
You need a 15-25% IT spend recovery thesis documented before the next QBR or value-creation review.
CIO
You inherited SaaS sprawl and need an outside read before committing to renewals or terminations.
CEO
You suspect there is meaningful savings in IT spend but have no way to prove it.
Scope
What this initiative delivers, and what it does not.
Scope is fixed at signing. Items tagged TOP are available inside the broader Technology Operating Partner retainer; the initiative alone does not include them. Items tagged with an outside source require a separate specialty engagement.
In scope
- Vendor inventory intake (contracts, invoices, owner mapping)
- License utilization analysis for Microsoft 365, Azure, and other tenants where read-only access is granted
- Overlap analysis (tools doing the same job, redundant point solutions)
- Renewal calendar with negotiation-leverage signal per vendor
- Savings opportunity map, prioritized by effort and dollar magnitude
- Per-vendor negotiation playbook (renewal date, alternatives, removal vs. renegotiation)
Out of scope
- Negotiating contracts on your behalfTOP
- Terminating vendor agreements on your behalfTOP
- Vendor selection or RFP execution for replacementsTOP
- Implementing consolidation (migration, training, change management)TOP
- Audit of vendor invoices for billing errorsForensic engagement
Inputs
What we need from you
Provided at kickoff. Missing inputs delay the initiative; they do not change scope.
- List of technology vendors with annual spend
- Recent invoices and current contracts for top vendors by spend
- Read-only access to Microsoft 365 / Azure admin center for license-utilization data
- One to three stakeholder interviews (CFO or controller, IT lead, procurement lead)
Timeline
Week by week
Daily visibility throughout. Mid-initiative check confirms direction before the deliverable lands.
Week 1
Intake and utilization scans
Vendor inventory, contract collection, access setup. Microsoft 365 and Azure license utilization analysis, last-login patterns, dormant accounts.
Week 2
Overlap, sizing, mid-Initiative check
Vendor portfolio organized by category; overlap identified. Each opportunity sized in dollar terms with effort and risk markers. Mid-Initiative direction check with your CFO.
Week 3 (if required)
Playbook drafting and handoff
Per-vendor playbook keyed to renewal calendar. Tech P&L, savings map, and playbook delivered with walkthrough. Vendor counts above ~50 typically push the Initiative into week 3.
Output
What you walk away with
- Technology P&L by function (where the money actually goes)
- Savings opportunity map, prioritized by dollar magnitude and effort
- Renewal calendar with leverage notes
- Per-vendor negotiation playbook with alternatives identified
- Walkthrough call
Honest framing
What this initiative is not
Savings opportunity sizing is based on utilization data and benchmark pricing for comparable tools. Actual realized savings depend on your execution: negotiation outcomes, internal change management, and replacement-tool integration. We do not guarantee a savings percentage. We do not negotiate, terminate, or implement on your behalf.
If you are a portfolio company
How the work calibrates to the PE-backed seat.
Companies inside a PE portfolio operate against constraints generalist enterprise framing does not cover. Each of these shapes how the Initiative is scoped and sequenced.
- Board reporting cycle. Output is sized to land before the next quarterly board read, not the company's annual planning calendar.
- Exit window math. Decisions made 12 to 24 months ahead of exit show up at the bid. Where applicable, findings are tagged for the exit-window timeline they affect.
- Add-on integration tempo. Findings that pertain to acquisition integrations are surfaced separately so the deal team can either price them in or sequence the integration around them.
- Cost discipline by hold position. Recommendations are calibrated to where the portco sits in the hold cycle. A company in early hold has different cost flex than one 12 months from exit.
Related
Initiatives that pair with this one
FAQ
Questions buyers ask first
How much can we save through vendor consolidation?
Published benchmarks land between 20 and 30 percent of SaaS spend through consolidation alone, with some case studies reporting up to 36 percent on rationalized stacks. Preside engagements typically recover 15 to 25 percent of total IT spend in year one across SaaS, managed services, telecom, and infrastructure combined. The savings come from three places. Duplicate tools the business never inventoried. Auto-renewing contracts at last year's rate. Vendors charging for unused seats or unused capacity. The Cost Optimization Initiative produces the recovery plan with named contracts and named owners in 30 days.
How much should a mid-market company spend on IT as a percentage of revenue?
Cross-industry, mid-market IT spend lands in the 3 to 8 percent range depending on industry, with cross-industry averages from Deloitte and Avasant clustering near 3 to 5 percent. Financial services runs 6 to 12 percent. Healthcare 3 to 7. Manufacturing 2 to 4. The percentage is a starting point, not a target. The right question is what the spend is buying. Preside reports IT spend against revenue, against headcount, and against the outcomes it funds, so the board can see where the money goes and decide what to do with it.
How many SaaS apps does a mid-market company typically run?
Estimates vary widely by methodology. BetterCloud benchmarks mid-market companies at around 106 apps. Zylo's 2025 SaaS Management Index puts the 501-to-2,500-employee range closer to 255. Productiv puts it higher still. The pattern is consistent across all three: leadership teams can name 20 to 30 tools, and the gap is shadow SaaS that came in through individual cards, departmental free trials that converted, and tools acquired through M&A and never decommissioned. The Cost Optimization Initiative discovers the full inventory in the first two weeks and ranks it by spend, overlap, and business owner.
Why has SaaS consolidation slowed down?
BetterCloud's 2026 State of SaaSOps report found the SaaS consolidation rate slowed from around 14 percent to roughly 5 percent year over year. The easy duplicates are gone in most companies. What is left requires real trade-offs: workflow disruption, business-unit resistance, change management. The second wave of savings comes from contract renegotiation, license-tier rightsizing, and consumption optimization rather than tool elimination. Preside runs both waves on the same calendar.
For your role
Where this initiative fits into the wider Preside view
For CFOs →
Where IT spend becomes a P&L conversation, not a vendor list. The Technology P&L by function lands here.
For PE Operating Partners →
The 15-to-25 percent IT spend recovery thesis for value-creation reviews and 100-day plans.
For CIOs and Heads of IT →
How operating partners use the savings map to redirect spend toward growth-funding work, not to cut for cutting's sake.
Inside the broader program
When the initiative becomes the standing engagement
This Initiative is a one-time fixed-price engagement. The Technology Operating Partner relationship continues the work on a quarterly cadence at one of four Program tiers: the dashboard gets re-run, the savings get re-baselined, the architecture gets re-mapped, and the board gets the same format every meeting. Most clients begin with an Initiative like this one and decide on the tier after the deliverable lands.
Ready to scope this
From IT spend you cannot defend to a defensible Technology P&L. Two to three weeks.
One email. Brief description of the situation. We respond within one business day with initiative confirmation or a recommendation of a better fit.
Not sure this is the right initiative for your situation? Take the four-question path-finder for a personalized recommendation.